Conservation by Design is currently under construction. Please check back next year.

For strategies that aim to find efficient spatial solutions for multiple goals, the process may be more complex.

For exam­ple, in the wind ener­gy exam­ple we have been using, con­sid­er the strat­e­gy to engage util­i­ties in dri­ving bet­ter wind infra­struc­ture siting.

In the first step of the results chain, util­i­ties only pur­chase from providers doing good sit­ing. Which pro­duc­ers do the util­i­ties pur­chase from and where are they like­ly to expand wind infra­struc­ture? These are the areas in which we can expect improved sit­ing if the strat­e­gy works. Then the chain notes that few­er per­mit­ting prob­lems speed wind devel­op­ment. How much will the poten­tial wind foot­print grow because of this? If all this wind devel­op­ment is well sit­ed, where will it be placed?

Answer­ing these ques­tions will iden­ti­fy the poten­tial wind foot­print and the areas avoided.

These ques­tions could be answered sim­ply by using exist­ing pro­jec­tions or sys­tem­at­i­cal­ly col­lect­ed expert opin­ion and local knowl­edge, and over­lay­ing rel­e­vant data sets. Alter­na­tive­ly, they may be answered through com­plex mod­el­ing that includes spa­tial opti­miza­tion of data iden­ti­fy­ing rel­a­tive impor­tance of many sen­si­tive areas, ener­gy gen­er­a­tion poten­tial, dis­tance to trans­mis­sion infra­struc­ture and oth­er fac­tors that make wind devel­op­ment more or less profitable.